A Shot in the Arm?

A collegue recently commented on the difficulty or the desire to be objective.  This nails perspectivism on the head, or is it the cross?  From neo-perspectivism through neo-nuanced and neo-platonic we do have a dynamic*** of global balance.  More sorting later*.    Thus spoke Niche?

* 1-9-12  correction (not two Chinas: two perspectives.)
BTW:  Thus spoke Adam Smith.
D'Ribble[!] Which came first the crossroad or the chicken?**
Henwood/More?  More's the Pity?

[On the other arm, a nemesis may have stubbed a tow(sic) on the plank the nail sticks out of.]

[Speaking of Ice, Thom Hartmann is in Iceland and provides some of the neo-perspectivism.]

** 1-10-12 link added (plural)
*** also maybe plural(see Hartmann/neo-relativism?) dynamics?
[edit notes: Ctrl F "the cart"]
[Also Ctrl F "Descartes" and the four horsemen?]

[Note: I have been lax in my boldness of links as an aid to navigation or sense of the thread.  In that regard I finally bolded two.< now 3(!) >  Also my asterisks and [brackets] are time relative or sensitive. i.e. to flow of the read. Now I will also note the relative flow of neo-platonic, neo-perspectivism, neo-liberal, neo-con, neo-nuanced and neo-relativism, not to end with six, name names or Ctrl F.  BTW:  Excuse me if I don't go to the trouble of flip-flopping the tetrahedron, that is the point.(Ctrl F "the people" and "the constitution".)]
[Speaking of a4 or timing, my 4a brought me another F, if not CF.(Note grammar, numbers, shapes, timing, etc.) F is TBA. Not to mention ? Nor Kidding. In closing (?)(!) Or too close to the 4close or Bane?]
[Third Bane's a charm? i.e. convention, congress, cain ? ]
[Speaking of Bane and Try Angles or Flip Romney and flopping it.
BTW: Under the Flip link there is an accounting or statistical trick that is not unknown to the debate.  I won't play upon it, but it involves the "average tax cut" versus "the middle-income American."  It is mathematical hyperbole as well as reasonable, where reality is even more confusing.  It is more accurate to say that the richest are paying a lesser per cent of their gross (actual tax rate) than any other income category after the  standard deductions and other taxes are accounted for.]

> previous post <

Perspectivism

A preemptive thought intruded before I could go further. Where are the women?  I will leave that for another time.
So it is with only slight further ado, that I note the heading, as the only context for the mentioning** of a few blogs. 

Contrary Brin
Pax On Both Houses

From Gender to Genre:
Darwins-god
A forth perspective.*

The first two especially, respect style and perspectivism, not to mention** subject matter. 
The third is a stretch on a few counts*, let alone complexity. A runner-up for 4th might be:

*still in processing

1-6-15
[Pardon the spacing anomalies.]
Re:runner-ups. 
^*^ 3rd and 4th anachronism.** Counter-popperism? 
** asteri(s)cal anachronism ^context~mentioning^
(s) type-O?/ asterical(spell check in-operable[!]?)
[R.I.P. Not a shot at irony[!], police labor strife*** works where justice fails?
*** not a strike @ hard work, they do. [!](?) 

More Gill Let?

More Flex-balls ?
Fertil~ized ?
More Cowbell?

M: Tale of Two Bullies!Tale of Two Bullies!, C:O/ Caging Godzillas , W/ On the level...
F: (*)Carry On Comment!, Perspectivism, The Other Debates, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie! , Whistle Blowing in the Dark?, Z: Neo-changian? , (*)Recycling Trash, Here We Go Again, D&R Tan ya?, ?: Too Random...
or: A? Anticipation Project ^, P? Politics Local and National
FB? The Guardian?

[image tbi ] 

more cowbell









[image tbi ]  ( )

[finally/gnot exactly]
[But a D'R win of some de men shun.]






i. Bury the lede?
e. i.e. S.E. (vi) edgy

NFRY~(not fully rel8d yet)
Not 2 B  con`fused ... w/o?
(FN^)  The Other Debates, Perspectivism, Jeb Bush is full of Cow Pie!
oar
o.w. / or Pen ta go(~)'N ?

Let Alone... D(R)N~A ?*
   
* Ctrl F~M-beds @ S. .C 
C-O~W[tbK(o)?] nPS?
WTB ? [!] (.  .  .)

TMA

Too much or Tuesday Morning Associations.
MDA Memorial Day Associations?

Glenn Greenwald The Intercept.
Lede or Ship? 

A. quarter backing
B.  NYT Trumpets US Restraint Against ISIS, Ignores Hundreds of Civilian Deaths
C.  Noam Chomsky: Are the Media Still 'Manufacturing Consent'?

B was read before ABC were footnoted such, and pre-A~QB. 

The inspiration was anticipation of perspectivism on the part of these sources.  After reading Greenwald, the subject was perspectivism in the face of restraint. 

Update:  Sunday Related Difficulties Resolved*
*not exactly. 

Neo-Perspectivism

It is hard to say which niche this arises from.**
Neo-Nuanced is one trigger.***
Even if retro actively.
No silver bullet.
(Or Lone Ranger)
(I, II, III, IV, Not nor note.)
(Far From It)

Less embedded:
It is not just to Pop Culture but social engineering.
If that is an aphorism, you have one hint.(ouch)
But Freud and Hitler were both Austrian,
but the latter-day Austrians are economic transcendentalists.*
(Emerson, Niche& Rand?)
Some credit may be due to "Plato Not Prozac."

[Just in.]

***

Notes to Asterisk Readers:
It may help the flow if one reads the asterisks in order and after a full read of this piece, but scrolling over links as one goes will be useful.
* no Emerson
** last link inserted: Maybe way too much of a D'Ribble or G'Ribble?
[Apologies for Neo-Euphemism.]

[Breaking News:  Herman Cain will give an "unconventional Endorsement just prior to the South Carolina Primary. (Ctrl F "best" under vent) I hope it is not another one of his tours or projects, but if it is not a third party run or candidate it might be someone from out of the blue if not a write-in.  Huntsman or Bachmann also come to mind.]

***  The irony of taxes, GDP and debt. Is it in the charts?

> Previous Post <

Spare the ROD

Read of Day ?*

Speaking of Spare...

* OMGOP

M^: A Shot in the Arm?, Neo-Perspectivism

^ 5th dimension : Tails Aside (sc) [ ? ]

OLO?

4-13-15 ?!?  [~]

(fp?) mobius :A.  THE TRUTH APPARENT: A MOBIUS LAP , B. , C.  Too Random... , D. Re:Figure , E. Rough Riders , F. The Undisclosed Bunker Branch of the Government. G. Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor? , H. Stuart Smally Anyone? , I. RUNNING WITH RHETORIC .

Perspectivism

It is hard to get out of your own prism.*

* filter
[I'd rather be a paradox**, than pare a patient with a pair o'dice.]












** link inserted 12-19-12

FOOTNOTES PAGE January 2016 (page 1)

De~men~shun~alism[!]

Bohemian gravity!

Bohemian~INET*, Quid Pro Physics , A universe of 4 di-men shuns[!] ,Father, Son, ,  Meta4 V 4D, Chez V (slash) 4D , Wittgenstein ,

Gravitas~ Satire is not a two way street., 4Mat , Footnotes Page December 2014(Page One) , Way, Too Point Oh? , Or ask for a third , Funneling Crisis?

* compactified?

The catch may be in the fold.  The pun is in the journalism.  The trick or narrative may be in the math and physics.  The point is: what is a dimension?  Not to mention: what is a point?  A point may represent a perspective in space as well as what it may represent in view of the perspective.  A point has no dimension.  Two points represent 1 dimension or a line.   Three non-linear points determine a plane or represent 2 dimensions.  Four non-planar points, require 3 dimensions and represent volume or space.  But dimensions are one level below the point. 

Time is often referred to as the 4th dimension.  But returning to a point as representing no dimensions, 4 points equilaterally spaced require 3 dimensions (x, y & z).

1-23-16 Overton Perspectivism {perspectivalism: x, y, z}

Perspectivism

On Obama[!]
Lede or other shi#?

1. Meta PI*
2. (b.s.) turd+blossom**
3. (b.s.) lede or ineffable

Not that it worked out by intention, but "#/other/lede" are the order of inserted links.

(FP1)need update and reference to {L} to consider order of insert later
*gno pun intended nor post intelligencer  (npi)
** to  &3 file later  / 2. a, b, c, d. / 3.

Food for Thought...

Or Fodder for Field Blossoms ?

F1*, f2,   

* links unembedded further "fodder for" ? !

5-20-13: Krugman perspectivism.
I'm not saying...
Is it a win for transparency or more of the same GOP trickle-down?
James Rosen Treason?
Robert Kennedy Jr. Plumbers?

FB
Recently Pulled Submission(Not by me)  Re: Watergate/ Democrats ~ holding to their own standards ~ their own~ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/obama-nixon-watergate_b_3305611.html

C: Green walled [!]

5-22-13*** 
IRS testimony**, the other Rand, McCain/Graham Rice, "fool's errand" [?]
**Issa touts the 5th (C-NOW w/ Alex Wagner) "Republicrats" "Democans" "barking up the wrong tree" Charlie Cook.
(*** b.s.): Knot So Well ?  Sheep in FOX clothing? 

5-23-13: Boardman, Reich, Wired, Cole ? Not to coat tails.
Millennial Miss fits?

Below the Fold[!]

What if?

To pun on lede or ship we are on [!]*
C-labels or Art Young.
Ctrl F perspectivism, dimentionalism, Al Gore Rhythms.
(PR: preemptive reads?)
"due the math"

*spoiler alert[last 4 inserts]

Literally...

{Kruger Leap?  Inversal Pictures[!]}1-23-16

Tetrahedralism?

A Perspectivism?

Relemma Recon-

jugation?  (2-18-15)
O~W
(Knot gun a due it~/ ) ~/ Fix News,  Perspectivism

Said Relief?

Who said, he Said, they said.

Egypt Update.
Speaking of Journalism** or freedom's intent.
Other Associations and Said Groups...

Note preemptive nature of links, as not all are read fully nor sometimes more than scrolled over.

In that vein, here is another mid-read comment--
--
The Prophet Margin* or "Decartes Bones"(not 2 mention) quote:(p.XIX)

Most people seem to be caught between these tidal currents--the pull to faith and tradition in a dangerous world, the argument that religion is at the core of the world's problems and only a revived commitment to individual freedoms and rights will steer humanity into a better future.

Colin Slee said about England:"You have a triangle with fundamentalist secularists in one corner, fundamentalist faith people in another, and then the intelligent, thinking liberals of Anglicanism, Roman Catholicism, baptism and methodism, other faiths--and, indeed, thinking atheists--in the other corner."

--

* my characterization although I do not necessarily appreciate the characterizations that follow, but it is the Ge Oh Me Try, not to mention who is at the table.

** link lost in editing(still looking) maybe found.
[along the same line, the first link is too embedded in comment on journalism and comment, while the last link on "freedoms"(edit to possessive)is embedded with preemptive history and irony
(ex. Alexander Hamilton against the Bill of Rights, yet for a National Bank.)]
[Journalism link now replaced and here is an un-embedded link from it.]

Speaking of Relief:or spin zones or characterizations. 'nO'Really!

[Said Review: Post an achronism. (Relative to perspectivism)]

Loose Lips and Sinking Metaphors

Footnotes PAGE Under Construction:

1-25-12

From loose lips to sinking ships. The Last Word hits the nail on the arc. Actually that is not the nail, but lip schtick, was on the horizon. It regards the history of the Republican Taxpolicy visa-vi debt policy. Not to mention Paw-lenty of Pie and Metaphor On.

1-26-12 [spin off of above...]

On the horizon, from G.H.W. Bush's "read my lips" to Bruce Bartlett's point: "1990 is the last time you had a leading Republican figure or President who cared about the deficit..." It is ironic he points out that the US is under the lowest tax burden in history compared to GDP.

More on Pit Bullies, in con text. Not that the gap in context is part of the con text, but the in con text(links) provide tripartite context**. In less embedded prose, bully for the Clemons piece, the Austrian pitting of Obama/Brewer, in relation to the Bush years, Iran con, and economics texting. While the final con text is the Standard and Pours[!] of the Neo-perspectivism on flip-flop and nuance. One try angle, another try angle. Not to call an odd man out, nor 4wo***man, but under the con I(above)ran a Just Foreign Policy sample, that takes a look at the dynamics of diplomacy. *

* not to be fair and balanced, nor brush off or in women,

the last three links reference; Hillary Clinton, Joan Walsh and Susan Rice.

** there by allowing 3 links to follow the pit bullies dynamics (2+3=5)

*** not to con grew an arc

(I plead the 5th in regard to irony[!])

[1-27-12: Related irony or booked signing?]

< previous post >

PC [^]

Pathological[!] Corner*

Kant we all get along without going to Hegel?
Not without Hume or Mill.
Forgot the punch line.**

* (b.s. )
** the third clause will come to me(was it the bottom line?)

[!] =  "..." or (sic){L} (i.e.) ePH'n pun
Related googles: a, b, c

Inspiration: perspectivism on progress
[Un-PC or Ahegelian? Or Perspective Catch.]

11-23-13 The Foundation [!]***

*** routing branches (knot too frack) Hegelian Punditry
{spoiler alert} [^]  R "air quotes" needed?

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO JULY 2014

7-10-14:  Ctrl F(transcend)- Heuristic Concurrence and, Italics added:,The Randslide?, Health Care Summit, (b,c,d)  hobgoblin
FYI-Not Newfangled, Ctrl F Emerson{L}pax- Neo-Perspectivism { } by Stiob?!? ...  [!]*


* potential FP3 There in spirit.


7-14-14 "sarcasm aside"...  (sc...goo) Original Cross Country Pole R express.(ow) (FP!)

"Juridical Positivism"

Bookmarks in Progress.

(b.s.) American Exceptionalism
(b.s.) Hegel Popper

** ~ (*)  obviously not the only problem
The problem with science is labelism, perspectivism and humanity*.
...or generalizations and definitions.
( New Meta Theory )  ~Mobius asterisk*

Meanwhile.

[Antipodes of Narrative]
...(the muse escapes)***
[Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander]^

*** (apotheosize and anthropomorphize)
[Hegel’s philosophy is open to many objections, but to confound it with totalitarianism means to misunderstand it. Ernst Cassirer puts the matter very clearly in The Myth of the State (1946), a book dealing with much the same material as Popper’s, but in a much more scholarly manner. His Hegel chapter ends: “Hegel could extol and glorify the state, he could even apotheosize it. There is, however, a clear and unmistakable difference between his idealization of the power of the state and that sort of idolization that is the characteristic of our modern totalitarian systems.”]

^tetrahedron of history or teachers

[[Lacanian Leap?]]

All Blank are not created equally.

Under 4eh[!]

OK, one of the A's was "anecdotal".  Not only that it was an old story and not much of one.
(Open carry robbed of gun at gun point.)
One of the four blank or Hume or everything. 
"Kant we get along..." etc.
Let alone Bane or...Mill.
Let alone "Math is next to..." rhetoric of the I ron knee age.

Just because you think(...) doesn't mean someone is not.
Tan gent: Hegelian Fallacy. 

https://www.fhu.com/hegelian.html

http://nord.twu.net/acl/dialectic.html

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Hegelian+dialectic*

http://www.therightplanet.com/2014/01/hegelian-dialectics-for-dummies/

*Not to mention, not all links are created equal.

[  http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm ]

An  Inconvenient Truth ?

Or unweaving of a quilt?

[2A] Academics is like congress, you have to remember there is always perspectivism. 

A Triangle

Bermuda Try Angle
A Victim of Teapublican Policies, Carl Gibson**
The Collapse of the Climate Change Contrarians, Juan Cole*
Ludicrous Times Op-Ed Forgets Entire Year of Wall Street History, Matt Taibbi

Certainly a triangle of skeptics.

*A foundation of skeptics:  based on perspectivism of Voodoo.
[I have only fully read the Cole piece.]
** previous pieces

[Nail in the coffin of so-called "Obama Economy".]

[8-8-12 Retro sort of.  Knot ing ham.]